Deciding where AI fits in our creative process, and where it doesn't
I established a culture of experimentation on a 27-person team to find the right places for AI in creative work, then shipped the tools and workflows that put it there.
I lead Brand & Creative for Coursera and Udemy across brand strategy, writing, design, video and events, while the two public companies merge. A big question for the team this year was AI: where it makes creative work better, where it doesn't, and how to find out without anyone feeling their craft was on the line.
- Establish a point of view. We outlined an AI creative philosophy for the company: humans own the story, and AI comes along to support.
- Make it safe to try. I created “Claude Show and Tell,” a session where anyone on the team could share an experiment, finished or not, and the rest of us could learn from it. Experimenting became part of the job rather than a threat to it.
- Solve real problems. We found where our capacity or process had challenges and experimented to see if AI could help, so every experiment started from a bottleneck the team already felt.
- Test, then scale. Everything starts as a pilot with one team or one campaign. We get feedback, fix what breaks, and only when it's working does it become a scaled solution the whole marketing org can use.
I helped the team build systems to power on-brand creative at scale: a self-serve creative hub, brand voice tools, production automation and a co-brand design system for the combined company.
What I'd do differently: set proxy measures for creative's business value earlier (delivery speed, volume absorbed, agency spend avoided) instead of waiting for clean performance data across two companies.
My role: set the direction and the operating model, sponsored each experiment and tool, and owned the merger brand work with the executive team.